There is a version of love that most of us grew up believing in: sudden, irresistible, something that happens to you rather than something you build. A force that arrives — and if it is real, carries you forward.
Or you prefer rather to call? +41 22 900 11 28
That version of love is deeply embedded in the culture. It is in every film that ends with the couple finally together, in every song that describes falling as inevitable, in the language we use — falling in love, losing yourself in someone, being swept away. The imagery is consistently one of losing control.
And yet most people who have loved well — who have sustained a relationship across years, across difficulty, across the inevitable changes that time brings — know that love is not only what happens at the beginning. It is, more truly, what one chooses to do after that beginning has passed.
This is the heart of intentional love. Not a rejection of feeling, but a recognition that feeling alone is not enough to sustain what matters most.
Intentional love is the practice of choosing, actively and repeatedly, to invest in a relationship with care, presence and full awareness of what that investment requires.
It is not the suppression of spontaneity or emotion. It is not a clinical approach to intimacy, as though love could be reduced to a process or a checklist. It does not mean that attraction, chemistry and feeling are irrelevant — they are, in fact, essential components of the foundation. What intentional love adds to that foundation is the understanding that a relationship requires more than feeling to last.
Research in relationship psychology has increasingly moved in this direction. Sara Nasserzadeh, Ph.D., whose Emergent Love Model draws on two decades of work with couples across more than 40 countries, reframes love not as a foundation upon which relationships are built, but as the outcome of consistent, intentional relational practices. In this understanding, love does not simply arrive and sustain itself. It is created — through the repeated, conscious choice to attend to another person with honesty, care and genuine presence.
It is not the same as effort for its own sake — the dutiful maintenance of a relationship that has long since stopped nourishing either person. It is not the performance of commitment without its substance. And it is not a substitute for genuine compatibility; intention applied to the wrong relationship simply postpones a necessary clarity. Intentional love is not a correction. It is a quality of engagement that makes the right relationship flourish.
The idea of falling in love is so familiar that it is easy to forget it is a metaphor — and a somewhat troubling one. Falling implies passivity, the loss of agency, an experience that happens to you rather than one you participate in creating.
This distinction matters because the falling model, however vivid and real the experience it describes, sets up a set of expectations that do not survive long-term intimate life particularly well. If love is something that happens to you, then a relationship that requires work is a relationship where something has gone wrong. If the feeling should simply be there, then its absence or fluctuation is a sign that the relationship is not the right one. The logic of the falling model produces, quietly and persistently, a low tolerance for the ordinary difficulty that every sustained relationship involves.
Research on the evolutionary function of romantic love across 90 countries, published in Human Nature in 2024, offers an interesting counterpoint. It proposes that romantic love evolved, in part, as a commitment device — a mechanism that naturally reduces interest in alternatives and signals to a partner a genuine orientation towards the relationship. In this reading, love is not separate from commitment; it is, in its deepest function, a form of it. The feeling and the choice are not opposites. They are, at their best, the same thing expressed in different registers.
Intentional love is not the end of romance. It is what romance becomes when it matures — when the initial intensity finds a steadier, more durable form without losing its essential warmth.
Setting intentions for love is not a one-time decision. It is an ongoing orientation, a way of approaching both the search for a relationship and the relationship itself.
Before a relationship begins, intentionality means being genuinely honest about what one is looking for — not just in terms of surface preferences, but in terms of values, emotional orientation and the kind of life one wants to share with someone. Research on long-term compatibility consistently identifies shared values and goals as the strongest predictor of relational durability — not attraction, not demographic alignment, but the deeper alignment in how two people understand what matters and how they want to live.
This kind of clarity is not about being rigid. It is about knowing oneself well enough to recognise genuine compatibility when it appears — and to distinguish it from convenience, familiarity or the simple relief of no longer searching. The person who approaches love with intention is looking for someone whose presence in their life makes the relationship feel like an expansion rather than a compromise.
In the search for a relationship, intentionality also means being honest about readiness — not urgency, but the genuine preparedness to bring one’s full self to a new relationship rather than arriving with unresolved patterns from previous ones. Timing matters in love, as it matters in most significant endeavours. The most carefully considered introduction cannot flourish if either person is not truly ready for what it requires.
Inside a relationship, intentional love is expressed less in grand gestures than in the quality of everyday attention.
It is the practice of being genuinely present — not merely physically present, but emotionally available, listening to understand rather than to respond, noticing the person rather than simply moving through the shared logistics of a life together. Research on intimacy consistently identifies it as the component of love most closely associated with long-term relational satisfaction — built not through dramatic acts but through shared experience, honest communication and the repeated choice to be vulnerable with another person.
Intentional love means maintaining the quality of curiosity that characterised the beginning of the relationship. People change, and a partner known well at thirty may be a different person at forty-five — having developed new perspectives, navigated new difficulties, arrived at new understandings of themselves. The intentional lover does not assume they already know the other person completely. They remain genuinely interested.
It also means navigating difficulty with the relationship’s long-term health in mind — not suppressing conflict, but approaching it as something to be worked through together rather than won or avoided. The capacity to disagree constructively, to repair after rupture and to return to each other honestly is not a sign that a relationship is in trouble. It is a sign that it is being tended with care.
None of this is heroic. It is, in many ways, quietly ordinary — the accumulation of small choices, made consistently over time, to treat another person as genuinely worth the investment of one’s full attention. That is, in the end, what intentional love looks like from the inside.
Macbeth Matchmaking exists for people who do not leave love to chance.
That phrase — for people who don’t leave love to chance — is not a marketing position. It is the most precise description we have of the people we work with and the approach we take. Our clients are people who have recognised, usually through experience rather than theory, that the passive model of love — waiting for the right person to appear, trusting that circumstances will eventually produce the right outcome — has not served them well.
Our role is to support that intention with the specific expertise and human insight that makes a genuine difference. We believe that love, at its best, is not something that happens to you. It is something you build — with intention, with care and with the courage to choose, fully and repeatedly, the person in front of you.
If you are ready to approach your search with that quality of intention, we would be glad to begin the conversation.
Tell us about yourself — we will take it from there.
Intentional love means approaching love as an active, conscious choice rather than a passive experience. It is the recognition that lasting relationships are not simply the result of finding the right person, but of consistently choosing to invest in that relationship with honesty, presence and genuine care. This does not mean that feeling and spontaneity are excluded — they are essential. Intentional love adds to those feelings the understanding that they are insufficient on their own to sustain something meaningful over time. What distinguishes intentional love from the conventional idea of falling in love is not its depth or sincerity, but its awareness: the knowledge that love is something one builds, not simply something one finds.
Intentional love within a relationship is expressed through the quality of everyday attention rather than grand gestures. It means being genuinely present — listening to understand, noticing the other person rather than taking them for granted, maintaining the curiosity that characterised the beginning of the relationship as both people continue to change and grow. It means approaching conflict as something to be navigated together rather than won or avoided, and returning to each other honestly after difficulty. It means keeping one’s commitments — not just formally, but in the small, repeated acts of consideration that tell another person they are genuinely seen and valued.
The 3 6 9 rule is a popular heuristic sometimes discussed in dating culture: wait three days before texting after a first date, keep the first six dates relatively low-key, and consider whether a relationship has genuine long-term potential by the ninth date. Like most such rules, it has a kernel of practical wisdom — in this case, the value of not rushing, allowing a natural rhythm to develop and taking the time to assess compatibility before investing too deeply too quickly. In the context of intentional love, the spirit of the rule is sound even if the specific numbers are arbitrary. What matters is not the timeline but the quality of attention one brings to each stage of a developing relationship — the willingness to be genuinely present, to observe what is actually there rather than what one hopes to find, and to allow clarity to develop naturally rather than forcing a conclusion in either direction.